Local business? Support local news on QueenCreek.city

Back to Arizona

Arizona's canal agency pulls out of Rocky Mountain cloud seeding as its Colorado River fight with upstream states grows

In a close vote, the Central Arizona Project board declined to renew funding for a program it joined in 2007, as Nevada and California agencies urged it to stay in.

Pierce Keller· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

November 12, 20262 min read

Colorado River water - illustration, Jake Team LLC

The agency that delivers the Colorado River to Phoenix-area and Tucson-area customers has stopped paying into a nearly 20-year-old program to squeeze more snow out of storms over the Rocky Mountains, where most of the river's water starts.

At its early-November meeting, the Central Arizona Project board narrowly voted against paying for the next phase of a cloud seeding partnership in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, KJZZ reported. CAP has been part of the effort since 2007, alongside Las Vegas and Los Angeles water providers and large farm districts in Southern California.

Cloud seeding releases tiny particles into passing clouds. It cannot create new snow, but it can nudge clouds to drop moisture where operators want it. Together, Lower Basin agencies have put roughly $1.5 million a year into the upstream work. Under the next phase, each agency's share would top out at $525,000 a year in 2027, climbing gradually to $750,000 a year by 2036.

Why the board said no

Board members who voted against renewal questioned whether Arizona customers would get their money's worth. "It's hard to see how this is really going to help our customers, especially in the environment that we're working in right now, and our taxpayers," board member Alexandra Arboleda said, according to KJZZ.

Board member Stephen Miller said the science shows seeding works but the results are hard to measure.

CAP's own staff argued the other way. Nolie Templeton, who manages Colorado River policy and analysis for the agency, cited studies suggesting snowpack gains of up to 20% and said seeding could be among the cheapest ways to add water to the basin.

Board member April Tornquist, who voted to keep funding it, said her main worry was whether Arizona would see any share of the added water from Upper Basin states.

A sharper river fight

The vote comes as the seven Colorado River states remain split. After the states failed to agree on how to share the shrinking river, the federal government drew up a plan that imposes mandatory cuts on Arizona, California and Nevada while requiring no new mandatory cuts from Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico and Colorado.

Arizona and CAP are both seeking to join a legal challenge to that plan, KJZZ reported, and CAP stands to take some of the deepest reductions.

Arizona's Lower Basin partners are not following its lead. Letters urging CAP to stay in came from the Southern Nevada Water Authority and six California water agencies, and both have taken steps to pay for additional seeding upstream in the years ahead, according to the station.

Scientists at the meeting estimated seeding can add up to 20% to individual storms and typically 5% to 15% over a winter season, KJZZ's water reporter said.

Sources

kjzz.org

kjzz.org

Share

Pierce Keller· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Pierce Keller writes about community life, schools, public safety, and local events in Queen Creek.

Related Stories

More in Sport