Local business? Support local news on QueenCreek.city

Back to Arizona

Prop. 319 would bar new speed and red-light cameras in Arizona and make cities win voter approval for the ones they have

The Legislature's measure lets existing camera contracts run only until a local vote, then 10 years at a time. Backers cite privacy and fines; health and safety groups say red-light cameras prevent deadly crashes.

Briar Doyle· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

October 26, 20262 min read

Traffic Enforcement Vote - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Arizona voters will decide Nov. 3 whether cities and state agencies can keep using cameras to ticket speeders and red-light runners.

How it would work

Proposition 319, referred to the ballot by the Legislature as Senate Concurrent Resolution 1004, would stop any local authority or state agency from running a photo enforcement system unless it signed a contract before Dec. 31, 2026, according to the Legislative Council's ballot analysis.

Places that already have a contract would not get to keep it indefinitely. Each would have to put its program before voters at the next general election, which FOX 10 reports would be 2028. If voters say no, the cameras must stop within 90 days.

If they say yes, the program can run for 10 years before another vote is required. State law already keeps photo enforcement off highways, FOX 10 notes.

A no vote leaves the current rules in place.

The case for

Republican state Sen. Wendy Rogers sponsored the measure. She told KTAR she objects to drivers being photographed at intersections, compared the cameras to license plate readers on privacy grounds, and called the fines "a cash cow" for cities. Kristin Baumgartner, who chairs the Yavapai County Republican Party, told FOX 10 the cameras amount to surveillance of drivers who have done nothing wrong.

Part of the money from photo enforcement fines flows to the Citizens Clean Elections Fund, which helps pay for participating candidates' campaigns, so the measure would shrink that fund, KTAR reported. Rogers said she supports that effect. Democrats in Legislative District 3 have called the measure a back-door attempt to defund the Clean Elections Commission.

The case against

Will Humble, executive director of the Arizona Public Health Association, said he does not defend speed cameras but that red-light cameras save lives at the right intersections. Under the measure, he told KTAR, cities without cameras could never add them "no matter how dangerous their intersections get."

AAA Arizona's Michelle Donati pointed FOX 10 to Insurance Institute for Highway Safety research finding that red-light cameras reduced fatal red-light crashes by 21%.

A 2005 Federal Highway Administration study cited by KTAR found the cameras cut side-impact crashes by 25% but raised rear-end crashes by 15%.

Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed a Rogers bill with similar limits in 2023, KTAR reported.

Sources

azleg.gov

azleg.gov

ktar.com

fox10phoenix.com

ktar.com

Share

Briar Doyle· AI-assisted, edited by Jake Team

Briar Doyle covers Queen Creek city hall, the council, and county government.

Related Stories

More in Sport

Sport

Booker Had the Big Night. Phoenix’s Guards Made It a Win.

Devin Booker’s 43 points answered Phoenix’s ugly opener, but Collin Gillespie, Jordan Goodwin and Luke Kennard supplied enough organization and timely shooting to keep the Suns’ 131-122 victory over Golden State from becoming a one-man production.

Lena QuillOctober 25, 20263 min read