Back to Sport

Phoenix signed a 47.8% shooter. Now it wants him to risk missing.

Luke Kennard is being encouraged to shoot more in Phoenix. His accuracy and Collin Gillespie’s larger workload explain why the next step takes judgment.

Lena Quill

September 30, 20263 min read

Luke Kennard said Monday that Phoenix has urged him to take more attempts and accept more difficult shots. That is a sensible request for a player who made 117 of 245 three-pointers last season, good for 47.8%, while splitting the season between Atlanta and the Lakers.

It is also a request with a built-in danger: asking a precise shooter to create more difficulty can eventually make precision less precise.

The Suns begin camp Tuesday with Kennard’s role still a question of fit rather than a number on a shooting leaderboard. His accuracy offers an obvious potential benefit; the more demanding question is how that accuracy travels when the assignment includes tougher looks, less time to get set and fewer opportunities to wait for the ideal pass.

Phoenix’s own numbers explain the appeal. The Suns attempted 40.8 threes per game last season and made 36.1% of them. Kennard’s 47.8% gives the team a strong reason to make room for more of his shots.

It does not, by itself, establish that he should take every difficult attempt offered to him. A defender’s aggressive closeout can turn a three into a drive, a pass or a better shot for someone else. The best version of this experiment includes all four decisions, including the occasional refusal to fire.

The comparison with Collin Gillespie clarifies the choice without settling it. Gillespie made 232 of 578 threes for Phoenix at 40.1%. Kennard was more accurate; Gillespie operated at far greater volume.

Those figures speak to different things. They do not tell us that the two players faced identical shot difficulty, nor do they establish who is the better shooter overall. They show why percentage and workload have to be read together before anyone starts handing out minutes with a calculator.

Gillespie’s broader offensive workload gives Phoenix a counterweight to Kennard’s efficiency. He averaged 10.5 field-goal attempts, 7.2 three-point attempts, 12.7 points and 4.6 assists. His 4.1 rebounds and 1.2 steals also describe a fuller statistical contribution. The 1.6 turnovers per game sit on the other side of that involvement: more responsibility creates more opportunities to help and more opportunities to make a mess.

Kennard averaged 3.1 three-point attempts, 2.2 assists and 0.8 turnovers, with a 2.9 assist-to-turnover ratio. Phoenix should want to know whether those decisions survive a larger share of the offense. That does not mean turning him into Gillespie.

It means testing whether Kennard can punish a late closeout with a controlled attack, move the ball when the defense has already won the first exchange and still launch when the clock or the coverage makes the difficult three the right choice.

The hardest part is preserving the efficiency that makes Kennard so useful. A shooter’s value can be diluted if every possession becomes an audition for fearlessness. There is no prize for taking a bad shot with admirable confidence. Conversely, a reduced percentage would not automatically mean the expansion failed if Kennard’s tougher attempts bend the defense or lead to cleaner opportunities elsewhere.

The other end will help determine how much freedom either guard receives. Staying connected through screens and surviving the opponent’s preferred matchup could make a productive shooting combination usable for longer stretches. If Phoenix has to rearrange too much elsewhere to protect that combination, the extra shooting may carry a price.

Coach Jordan Ott has not announced a new starting lineup; he has room to weigh those costs during camp.

Kennard’s season will turn on a small distinction with large consequences: more attempts should mean more trusted decisions, not merely more shots. If an available look appears, Phoenix needs him willing to take it even after the harder invitation has produced a few misses. If he sees the defense offering something better, the smarter risk may be to pass.

The Suns’ investment will be measured in that moment—whether Kennard shoots the available look when it is there, and keeps the possession alive when it is not.

Sources

Arizona Republic: Suns media day

ESPN: 2025–26 statistics

ESPN: 2025–26 statistics

ESPN: 2025–26 statistics

Share

Lena Quill

Lena Quill covers Queen Creek high school and area college sports.

Related Stories

Sport

Arizona needs a rotation plan that can bend around Burnes

Corbin Burnes’ next step remains uncertain, and his opt-out decision is unresolved. Arizona’s 2026 rotation shows why the Diamondbacks need credible depth whether he remains or not.

Lena QuillSeptember 30, 20263 min read

Purdy's 297 Yards Lead 49ers Past Cardinals 36-30

Brock Purdy connected with George Kittle for two touchdowns as the San Francisco 49ers defeated the Arizona Cardinals 36-30 at Levi's Stadium. The 49ers improved to 3-0, while the Cardinals fell to 1-2.

Lena QuillSeptember 29, 20262 min read

More in Weather