Back to Queen Creek

Pinal County supervisors vote 5-0 to file a State Bar complaint against County Attorney Brad Miller

Supervisors did not say what the complaint covers, citing the confidentiality of the Bar's process; it follows months of disputes with the county attorney, including a court fight over an immigration agreement.

Briar Doyle

October 5, 20262 min read

Desert county courthouse at dusk - illustration, Jake Team LLC

Pinal County's five supervisors have voted unanimously to file a complaint with the State Bar of Arizona against County Attorney Brad Miller, who is both the county's elected prosecutor and the board's own lawyer.

The 5-0 vote came during a special session Friday, authorizing the board's outside attorneys to submit the complaint, the Arizona Mirror reported. Supervisors had met privately with those attorneys on Sept. 30.

The agenda for that closed session said they would seek advice on Miller's "ethical obligations to the Board of Supervisors," his scope of representation and Bar requirements in light of statements and actions by the county attorney toward the board and its members.

None of the supervisors said publicly what the complaint addresses, KJZZ reported Monday. Chairman Jeffrey McClure noted that the Bar keeps its disciplinary reviews confidential and said the complaint's substance should not be discussed until that process runs its course, according to the Mirror.

Vice Chairman Jeff Serdy said it would be up to the Arizona Supreme Court, not the board, to decide whether Miller faces any discipline.

Board spokesman James Daniels told the Mirror he could not provide more information. Miller's office did not respond to the Mirror's request for comment. Bar complaints stay confidential unless the State Bar moves forward with disciplinary action; attorney discipline records are public.

A year of disputes

The vote is the latest step in a running conflict between the Republican county attorney and the board since Miller took office in January 2025.

  • The board sent a referral about Miller to Attorney General Kris Mayes in February over the hiring of two employees without the board's authorization, the Mirror reported.
  • In April, supervisors declared a conflict of interest between Miller and the board.
  • The largest dispute involved Miller's decision in August 2025 to sign his office's 10 investigators up for a 287(g) immigration enforcement agreement with the Department of Homeland Security without notifying the board. Supervisors ordered him to end it, saying only the board can enter such partnerships with the federal government. A judge in Maricopa County Superior Court ruled in May that Miller had acted unlawfully, according to the Mirror.

The Pinal County Sheriff's Office operates under a separate 287(g) agreement, in place since 2008 and renewed by the board.

Queen Creek straddles the Maricopa-Pinal county line, so part of the town falls under the Pinal board and county attorney.

Sources

kjzz.org

newsfromthestates.com

Share

Briar Doyle

Briar Doyle covers Queen Creek city hall, the council, and county government.

Related Stories

More in Arizona